The Community of Inquiry makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
ABOUT THE FRAMEWORK
SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE

The Community of Inquiry theoretical framework represents a process of creating a deep and meaningful (collaborative-constructivist) learning experience through the development of three interdependent elements: social, cognitive and teaching presence.

SOCIAL PRESENCE

From Rourke et al., 2001:

Social presence is the ability of learners to project their personal characteristics into the community of inquiry, thereby presenting themselves as ‘real people.’

Instructional media such as computer conferencing engender high levels of student-student and student-teacher interaction; therefore, they can support models of teaching and learning that are highly interactive and consonant with the communicative ideals of university education. This potential, and the ubiquity of computer conferencing in higher education prompted three of the authors of the present paper to develop a Community of Inquiry model that synthesizes pedagogical principles with the inherent instructional and access benefits of computer conferencing (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000). The present article explicates one element of the model, social presence. Social presence is defined as the ability of learners to project themselves socially and affectively into a community of inquiry. A template for assessing social presence in computer conferencing is presented, through content analysis of conferencing transcripts. To facilitate explication of the scheme and subsequent replication of this study, selections of coded transcripts are included, along with inter-rater reliability figures. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications and benefits of assessing social presence for instructors, conference moderators, and researchers.

COGNITIVE PRESENCE

From Garrison et al., 2001:

Cognitive presence is the extent to which the participants in any particular configuration of a community of inquiry are able to construct meaning through sustained communication.

The purpose of this paper is to describe a practical approach to judging the nature and quality of critical discourse in a computer conference. A model of a critical community of inquiry frames the research. A core concept in defining a community of inquiry is cognitive presence. In turn, the practical inquiry model operationalizes cognitive presence for the purpose of developing a tool to assess critical discourse and reflection. Encouraging empirical findings related to an attempt to create an efficient and reliable instrument to assess the nature and quality of critical discourse and thinking in a text-based educational context are presented. Finally, it is suggested that cognitive presence (i.e., critical, practical inquiry) can be created and supported in a computer conference environment with appropriate teaching and social presence.

TEACHING PRESENCE

From Garrison et al., 2001:

Teaching presence is defined as the design, facilitation, and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educational worthwhile learning outcomes.

This paper reviews the tasks of the online teacher, gleaned from the literature and our own experiences as teachers of graduate level, online courses. It next introduces a technique for systematically analyzing the context of the text-based transcripts of those courses. We seek knowledge hidden in the data from the actual interactions between and among students and on-line teachers as they develop, facilitate, guide and evaluate learning activities. Our goal is to develop tools that are efficient, reliable, and practical in the task of helping teachers both understand and improve their on-line teaching. We examine messages for their contribution to three critical functions of the online (and classroom) teacher – designing and administrating learning activities, establishing and and maintaining an active learning community, and providing direct instruction. We hope our tools allow teachers to assess their own postings and serve as valued feedback for reflection and improvement of the teaching function. Secondly, the tools can be used for research to test hypothesis or diagnose problems in on-line teaching. We conclude with the results of our analysis of the transcripts from two graduate level teaching courses.

Key references available as a downloadable file below have been compiled by Dr. Randy Garrison as an effective reading list for the Community of Inquiry framework. (Updated September 2021)

CoI FRAMEWORK READING LIST
RECENT COMMENTS

Aruna Ullal on CoI survey link
1 week ago
Hi Dan, Thank you very much for directing me to the CoI survey. I will explore the survey, along with the additional links and materials available on the CoI Community website. This resource is incredibly helpful. Thanks again! ...

Dan Wilton on CoI survey link
1 week ago
Hello, Aruna, and welcome to the CoI community! You can find copies of the CoI survey to download by clicking "About CoI" in the navigation menu, then scrolling down to "The CoI Survey: Read about the survey". That will take you to this page: https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/coisurvey The standard survey is the ...

Aruna Ullal on CoI survey link
1 week ago
Hi My name is Aruna Ullal. I am a new member. I wanted to know where to find the Col survey link. Please advise. Thanks so much.

Stefan Stenbom on CoI seminar series 2025
3 weeks ago
Hi everyone, Welcome to the discussion forum for our international seminar series on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. This space is here to support ongoing dialogue, reflection, and knowledge exchange. You're also very welcome to join the discussions even if you're not part of the seminar series! Feel free ...

Stefan Stenbom on The CoI Community
3 weeks ago
Great to have you here! Your work with cMOOCs sounds really interesting, and it’s exciting that you’re using the CoI framework in your research. Looking forward to hearing more —welcome!

Chuanlei on The CoI Community
3 weeks ago
Hello everyone! I am a second-year graduate student from the Research Center for Distance Education at Beijing Normal University. I am very pleased to join this COI online community. Last year, I worked as a facilitator, providing learning support for three cMOOCs. This experience sparked my strong interest in the ...

Mirriam Moleko on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Hello everyone, My name is Mirriam Moleko, and I am from South Africa. I work in the field of mathematics education and have a strong interest in both mathematics and pedagogy. I am passionate about finding effective ways to make mathematics more accessible, engaging, and meaningful for all learners. I am excited to ...

Jon Jorgensen on The CoI Community
3 months ago
Hello everyone, I am Jon Jorgensen from Japan and California. I am a Scrum Master, Product Coach, Product Manager and trainer of people who create products which fundamentally alter the experience people have of life, themselves and their intentions. In my vocation I have experience establishing Communities of ...

Edward Crutchleo on The CoI Community
4 months ago
noted with appreciation

Branislav Bédi on The CoI Community
4 months ago
Hello everyone, I'd like to introduce myself to the community here. I am a project manager and researcher at the Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies in Reykjavík, Iceland. While pursuing my doctorate in education degree, I came across the CoI framework, which well supports the theoretical foundation for ...
The Community of Inquiry is a project of Athabasca University, Mount Royal University, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and the Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, as well as researchers and members of the CoI community.