Is there a name for an ad hoc, undesigned, teacherless Community of Inquiry?
Discussion
Heather Saigo · opened 2 years ago
Hello! I am deep into literature review while I try to focus a dissertation topic in the neighborhood of online learning communities. I spent months down the Community of Practice rabbit hole, but thought the Community of Inquiry would be a better fit. I am reading Dr. Garrison's E-Learning book and making my way through the suggestions I've received here, including the list of essential CoI references I found. Thank you so much for sharing these resources!
Here is what I'm stuck on now. I participate in an online community. It is a Discord server of graduate students, and was created by students at the beginning of our doctoral program, August 2020 (pandemic cohort yaaaay!). It started as a place to gather and chat, but turned into an essential tool in our studies. We use it to form project groups, hold group meetings, chat sync/asynch about classes, homework, share resources, job listings, jokes, complaints, and support each other through mundane and major life events. Two years in, it has definitely become more than a casual social group, but I'm not sure what to call it. Could it be a CoI? We do help each other learn, but none of us are designated Teachers. Well, we have many professional teachers in the cohort, but in this context, we are all learners. No faculty or school leadership participates in the community.
What do you think? Is this possibly a CoI? Or maybe I'm trying to fit it into the CoI framework because I don't know enough to give it a more appropriate label? I'm certainly not well-versed in every learning theory. Is there one that fits better? Or is there room in the CoI universe for this kind of community? Learner-led, ad-hoc, online CoI?
Thank you for listening. I'm kind of thinking out loud so I apologize for the lack of focus. So many questions! :-)
Here is what I'm stuck on now. I participate in an online community. It is a Discord server of graduate students, and was created by students at the beginning of our doctoral program, August 2020 (pandemic cohort yaaaay!). It started as a place to gather and chat, but turned into an essential tool in our studies. We use it to form project groups, hold group meetings, chat sync/asynch about classes, homework, share resources, job listings, jokes, complaints, and support each other through mundane and major life events. Two years in, it has definitely become more than a casual social group, but I'm not sure what to call it. Could it be a CoI? We do help each other learn, but none of us are designated Teachers. Well, we have many professional teachers in the cohort, but in this context, we are all learners. No faculty or school leadership participates in the community.
What do you think? Is this possibly a CoI? Or maybe I'm trying to fit it into the CoI framework because I don't know enough to give it a more appropriate label? I'm certainly not well-versed in every learning theory. Is there one that fits better? Or is there room in the CoI universe for this kind of community? Learner-led, ad-hoc, online CoI?
Thank you for listening. I'm kind of thinking out loud so I apologize for the lack of focus. So many questions! :-)
Register to post a comment.
POST A COMMENT
Heather Saigo · 2 years ago
Thank you for your insights, Dan! As I learn more about CoI and understand the constructs that define the presences, I'm noticing areas of overlap and harmony with other theories. I am working out where to blend edges versus draw lines. After a while, it is a bit like sampling too many perfumes. They all have some things in common, but have different names and essential elements. It reminds me of my biology background... Do we "lump" or "split" when classifying organisms? Focus more on grouping by similar characteristics versus dividing by distinguishing differences? I admit I'm a novice at learning theories... Trying to put together puzzles with infinite numbers of pieces, undefined corners, and a moving picture on the box. :-)
Reply
Dan Wilton · 2 years ago
Yes - because learning is so complex and so intangible, we'll likely never be able to approach it directly, so it might be useful to see each theory as trying to approach it from a different perspective, with its own beliefs, values, and goals.
The CoI framework, for example, could be interpreted as trying to integrate three different perspectives on the central idea of an "educational experience", and how these perspectives overlap reveals additional perspectives.
You can see more from some perspectives than from others, but none of them captures the full complexity of that central idea. Each perspective can be defined precisely, but you can shift your point of view smoothly from one to the next. If you share the same perspective as those around you (say, your committee), then you can often have a richer conversation with them about it - usually a good way to get started. Introducing a new perspective can potentially lead to a richer understanding in the end, if you're clear on what your perspective is, including your beliefs, your values, and your goals.
If you haven't already, you might look up "paragogy" (sometimes called "peeragogy") - not necessarily as yet another alternative to the CoI but as an additional perspective on what the CoI and many others are trying to do.
The CoI framework, for example, could be interpreted as trying to integrate three different perspectives on the central idea of an "educational experience", and how these perspectives overlap reveals additional perspectives.
You can see more from some perspectives than from others, but none of them captures the full complexity of that central idea. Each perspective can be defined precisely, but you can shift your point of view smoothly from one to the next. If you share the same perspective as those around you (say, your committee), then you can often have a richer conversation with them about it - usually a good way to get started. Introducing a new perspective can potentially lead to a richer understanding in the end, if you're clear on what your perspective is, including your beliefs, your values, and your goals.
If you haven't already, you might look up "paragogy" (sometimes called "peeragogy") - not necessarily as yet another alternative to the CoI but as an additional perspective on what the CoI and many others are trying to do.
Reply
JOIN THE COI COMMUNITY
RECENT COMMENTS
Lailaturrahmi on The CoI Community
2 months ago
Hi Marije,
I am not sure if this addresses your question, but this tool may help: Teacher Self-Assessment and Exploration Tool: https://read.aupress.ca/read/principles-of-blended-learning/section/2b32aff1-63b8-4b09-9c79-84bc13b61a56 ...
Damilare on The CoI Community
2 months ago
Hello community,
I'm Dami, a student of Political Science and International Relations. From Osun State University, Nigeria. I saw this community, because I was in search of a community that would help improve my knowledge, and might get to meet students like me who wants to get better in their various courses and be ...
D. Randy Garrison on The CoI Community
3 months ago
Marije,
Not sure I can be of much direct help. There is considerable research on faculty development if that would help.
There is extensive research where faculty have used the CoI framework to design online learning experiences.
Finally, I am not clear as to your question regarding different courses. the framework ...
Marije Lesterhuis on The CoI Community
3 months ago
Hey all,
I am an assistant professor at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands. I am interested in the framework, as my PhD student in Kenya is using it in his PhD research. He is looking into online and blended learning. We've found already some work within medical education, but have not found much ...
D. Randy Garrison on Cognitive Presence Update
10 months ago
The easy answer is that they cannot be easily separated; they overlap in the Venn diagram. According to the diagram and theory, each can have differing influence on the educational experience (dependent variable however it is defined).
Off the top I suppose that the correlation among the presences will depend on the ...
FA Triatmoko HS on Cognitive Presence Update
11 months ago
Do you think that the 3 elements of CoI need to be explained in model which explain the correlation or causality? For examples, whether CP is as a dependent variable for TP and SP. Or is it that CP, TP and SP cannot be separated in ...
FA Triatmoko HS on CoI Effectiveness and Future Development
11 months ago
Will try to look into this. Thank you for the suggestion.
D. Randy Garrison on CoI Effectiveness and Future Development
11 months ago
Perhaps use other examples of indicators from the CoI elements?
To be more specific i would suggest using the questionnaire items to begin to generate corresponding indicators. Conversely we used indicators from each of the three elements to help generate CoI questionnaire ...
FA Triatmoko HS on CoI Effectiveness and Future Development
11 months ago
Thank you for your response. Do you have any suggestions on where to start?
D. Randy Garrison on The CoI Community
11 months ago
Hi Audrey,
Although I had researched self-directed/regulated learning early in my career, it was a research project by another scholar that suggested integrating a self-directed learning element into the CoI framework that precipitated our work on self and co-regulation. I found a couple of fundamental issues with ...
I'd tentatively suggest that a safe working label for your community, for now, is "a study group". Study groups have been critical pockets of learning - and inquiry - for thousands of years, and any learning theory should ultimately have something useful to say about them. To what degree your study group ends up acting as a community of inquiry is arguably something to be investigated, perhaps as an initial step towards helping it develop.
Some possible points that come to mind:
Note that I'm using the lower-case letters: a [lower-case] community of inquiry is essentially a phenomenon, a "spirit of communal inquiry" that may or may not emerge out of a group of people working together to investigate or learn something. Its philosophical roots (eg., Peirce) go back to communities of scientists, with the argument that we can only approach something like "scientific truth" through a deliberate collective process. Importantly, those scientists weren't led by teachers; they led themselves. The application to education came later.
Not every study group will have that spirit or commitment to collective inquiry. Some study groups might live their lives happily as a way to share notes more efficiently or for social support only - in other words, not the full range of presences.
On the other hand, the Community of Inquiry [upper-case] is a framework and set of tools to design a more deliberate community of inquiry [lower-case], integrating all three presences, without having to leave so much up to chance. So "ad hoc" and "CoI" [upper-case] might not sit as comfortably together. A design implies some sort of designer, ie., a leader, and some form of teaching presence. But that doesn't mean the design, leadership, and teaching will all be concentrated into one person; in fact, the "spirit of communal inquiry" would suggest it shouldn't be.
So the distinction between "a community of inquiry" (spirit) and "the Community of Inquiry" (structure) might become important, and where your study group falls - or could fall - between the two might depend on how "ad hoc, undesigned, and teacherless" it actually turns out to be. It'll be interesting to see what you find out.