The Community of Inquiry makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
Is there a name for an ad hoc, undesigned, teacherless Community of Inquiry?
Heather Saigo · opened 2 weeks ago
Hello! I am deep into literature review while I try to focus a dissertation topic in the neighborhood of online learning communities. I spent months down the Community of Practice rabbit hole, but thought the Community of Inquiry would be a better fit. I am reading Dr. Garrison's E-Learning book and making my way through the suggestions I've received here, including the list of essential CoI references I found. Thank you so much for sharing these resources!

Here is what I'm stuck on now. I participate in an online community. It is a Discord server of graduate students, and was created by students at the beginning of our doctoral program, August 2020 (pandemic cohort yaaaay!). It started as a place to gather and chat, but turned into an essential tool in our studies. We use it to form project groups, hold group meetings, chat sync/asynch about classes, homework, share resources, job listings, jokes, complaints, and support each other through mundane and major life events. Two years in, it has definitely become more than a casual social group, but I'm not sure what to call it. Could it be a CoI? We do help each other learn, but none of us are designated Teachers. Well, we have many professional teachers in the cohort, but in this context, we are all learners. No faculty or school leadership participates in the community.

What do you think? Is this possibly a CoI? Or maybe I'm trying to fit it into the CoI framework because I don't know enough to give it a more appropriate label? I'm certainly not well-versed in every learning theory. Is there one that fits better? Or is there room in the CoI universe for this kind of community? Learner-led, ad-hoc, online CoI?

Thank you for listening. I'm kind of thinking out loud so I apologize for the lack of focus. So many questions! :-)
Register to post a comment.

Dan Wilton · 2 weeks ago
This could become a very complex discussion, Heather, so thanks for opening it as its own topic.

I'd tentatively suggest that a safe working label for your community, for now, is "a study group". Study groups have been critical pockets of learning - and inquiry - for thousands of years, and any learning theory should ultimately have something useful to say about them. To what degree your study group ends up acting as a community of inquiry is arguably something to be investigated, perhaps as an initial step towards helping it develop.

Some possible points that come to mind:

Note that I'm using the lower-case letters: a [lower-case] community of inquiry is essentially a phenomenon, a "spirit of communal inquiry" that may or may not emerge out of a group of people working together to investigate or learn something. Its philosophical roots (eg., Peirce) go back to communities of scientists, with the argument that we can only approach something like "scientific truth" through a deliberate collective process. Importantly, those scientists weren't led by teachers; they led themselves. The application to education came later.

Not every study group will have that spirit or commitment to collective inquiry. Some study groups might live their lives happily as a way to share notes more efficiently or for social support only - in other words, not the full range of presences.

On the other hand, the Community of Inquiry [upper-case] is a framework and set of tools to design a more deliberate community of inquiry [lower-case], integrating all three presences, without having to leave so much up to chance. So "ad hoc" and "CoI" [upper-case] might not sit as comfortably together. A design implies some sort of designer, ie., a leader, and some form of teaching presence. But that doesn't mean the design, leadership, and teaching will all be concentrated into one person; in fact, the "spirit of communal inquiry" would suggest it shouldn't be.

So the distinction between "a community of inquiry" (spirit) and "the Community of Inquiry" (structure) might become important, and where your study group falls - or could fall - between the two might depend on how "ad hoc, undesigned, and teacherless" it actually turns out to be. It'll be interesting to see what you find out.
Heather Saigo · 1 week ago
Thank you for your insights, Dan! As I learn more about CoI and understand the constructs that define the presences, I'm noticing areas of overlap and harmony with other theories. I am working out where to blend edges versus draw lines. After a while, it is a bit like sampling too many perfumes. They all have some things in common, but have different names and essential elements. It reminds me of my biology background... Do we "lump" or "split" when classifying organisms? Focus more on grouping by similar characteristics versus dividing by distinguishing differences? I admit I'm a novice at learning theories... Trying to put together puzzles with infinite numbers of pieces, undefined corners, and a moving picture on the box. :-)
Dan Wilton · 1 week ago
Yes - because learning is so complex and so intangible, we'll likely never be able to approach it directly, so it might be useful to see each theory as trying to approach it from a different perspective, with its own beliefs, values, and goals.

The CoI framework, for example, could be interpreted as trying to integrate three different perspectives on the central idea of an "educational experience", and how these perspectives overlap reveals additional perspectives.

You can see more from some perspectives than from others, but none of them captures the full complexity of that central idea. Each perspective can be defined precisely, but you can shift your point of view smoothly from one to the next. If you share the same perspective as those around you (say, your committee), then you can often have a richer conversation with them about it - usually a good way to get started. Introducing a new perspective can potentially lead to a richer understanding in the end, if you're clear on what your perspective is, including your beliefs, your values, and your goals.

If you haven't already, you might look up "paragogy" (sometimes called "peeragogy") - not necessarily as yet another alternative to the CoI but as an additional perspective on what the CoI and many others are trying to do.


Heather Saigo on The CoI Community
3 weeks ago
Hi Martha! Thank you for those references. I am adding them to my reading list right now. I appreciate your help! Heather

Heather Saigo on The CoI Community
3 weeks ago
Hi Dan! Thank you for the welcome and the insight. I will check out that post for sure! Heather

Martha Cleveland-Innes on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Hi Heather! Great question. Leadership in any group can be informal, shared, and emergent. In education, connectivism tries to get to this. These ideas may start your review of this issue. Corbett, F., & Spinello, E. (2020). Connectivism and leadership: harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine ...

Dan Wilton on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Welcome to the CoI community, Heather! You might be interested in some of the ideas being explored by Terry Anderson and Jon Dron potentially to bridge the gap between more formal, deliberately planned communities of inquiry and informal "sets" or "networks" of learners. Dr. Anderson's blog post below might be a good ...

Heather Saigo on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Oh, I have been wondering about this and maybe someone here has insight. A Community of Inquiry can form without a formal set-up and instructor/leader? I feel like I've participated in CoI that took shape organically among a group of learners, but I'm not sure whether that fits the model. What do you ...

Heather Saigo on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Hello! I am a doctoral student in education, in the process of focusing my dissertation questions. I am curious about whether a Discord community constitutes a Community of Inquiry. Perhaps I will do a qualitative evaluation of online interactions to determine whether they fit the CoI framework. Still working on ...

Martha Cleveland-Innes on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Hello Ibrahim! Welcome to our log and repository. We look forward to hearing about your CoI research and the results. M.Cleveland-Innes

Ibrahim Garba on The CoI Community
1 month ago
Hello everyone from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia! I'm a Higher Education doctoral student at University of Liverpool in good old United Kingdom 💕! I look forward to sharing part of my thesis with you. I'm looking at ways to improve teaching and learning using the COI framework ...

Lintang Matahari Hasani on The CoI Community
2 months ago
Hello everyone, warmest greetings from Indonesia! I'm a lecturer and researcher at the Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia. I am looking forward to contribute in the implementation of CoI, especially in the fields of computer science education. I am excited to be a part of this amazing community! ...

Kristin Millard on The CoI Community
4 months ago
Hi, everyone. I am a Higher Education Leadership doctoral student at Maryville University in St. Louis, MO. My dissertation is a mixed-method study on the persistence of international students who study online while living in their home countries. I am using CoI as my framework. I am just beginning my research, and I ...
The Community of Inquiry is a project of Athabasca University, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and the Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, as well as researchers and members of the CoI community.