The Community of Inquiry makes use of cookies. By continuing, you consent to this use. More information.
THE IMPACT OF TEACHING PRESENCE
D. Randy Garrison
November 27, 2017

I have described teaching presence as the essential element of a community of inquiry that sustains a purposeful collaborative inquiry learning experience. Moreover, research has supported the theoretical claims of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. From this perspective my goal here is to highlight and comment on recent evidence in support of the essential role of teaching presence in a CoI.

The first research article is conclusive with regard to the positive impact of teaching presence "on learners' constructive and interactive engagement behaviors" (Zhang et al., 2016, p. 896). This is consistent with previous research and theoretical constructs with regard to the central role played by teaching presence (TP) (Garrison, 2017). Furthermore, their findings demonstrated enhanced communication and the construction of new knowledge beyond the explicit learning materials made possible through a community of inquiry. This adds additional evidence to the power of a CoI to achieve deep and meaningful learning processes and outcomes. Another recent article found that TP affected the degree of connectivity in a CoI (Chuang et al., 2016). They also concluded that TP may positively affect SP and CP.

Beyond TP specifically, another recent article confirmed the hypothesized relationships among the CoI presences (Saadatmand et al., 2017). Similar to previous research (see previous editorial), this study validates the structure and dynamics of the CoI framework. However, with regard to the focus here, the researchers argued "that teaching presence in the phase of pre-course design and organization and the facilitating role of instructors is significant in establishing a learning community that trigger learners' interaction during the course" (p. 72). This reinforces the essential role of TP to move discussion from the "exploration phase to integration of ideas into solutions" (p. 72). It is clear that TP in the form of design, facilitation and direction is crucial to the full development of practical inquiry.

The findings of the Saadatmand et al. (2017) article are further strengthened with the realization that this study was conducted within a massive open online course (MOOC) with the goal to create opportunities to think and learn collaboratively. As the study suggests, this can be done in a MOOC with good instructional design and the appropriate tools. The interesting insight and conclusion is that a CoI can be created and sustained in a MOOC with sufficient focus on TP. At the same time it must be realized that with a MOOC there is likely going to less flexibility in terms of design during the implementation phase of a CoI depending on the size of the cohort and duration of the course (Kovanovic et al., 2017).

In conclusion, the third edition of E-Learning in the 21st Century (Garrison, 2017) has a full discussion in support of the importance of the role of design and leadership in TP. I am hoping that a focus on TP will encourage a shift in our editorials and discussion to practical concerns and issues associated with the design and facilitation of learning in a collaborative environment. To this end my next post will focus on the use of the CoI framework to guide instructional design of a community of inquiry. In this regard I hope we can explore the function of TP further in the New Year.



REFERENCES

Chuang, V. J., Garcia, A. R. C., Bundgaard, H., Furu, P., Bregnhøj, H., Harker-Schuch, I. E.P., & Henriksen, C. B. (2016). Visualising the dynamics of online learning communities in online and blending learning courses: experiences from three university courses. Læring Og Medier, 10(16). Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/lom/article/download/24412/22147

Garrison, D.R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (3rd Edition). London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.

Kovanović V.,Joksimović, S., Poquet O., Hennis T., Čukić I., de Vries P., Hatala M., Dawson S., Siemens G., & Gašević D. (2017). Exploring communities of inquiry in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, Retrieved November 28, 2017 from: https://ac-els-cdn-com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/S0360131517302543/1-s2.0-S0360131517302543-main.pdf?_tid=fa8e462e-d476-11e7-a20e-00000aab0f26&acdnat=1511899493_2dd57af574398a915261fdba00ad6e5b

Saadatmand, M., Uhlin, L., Åbjörnsson, L., & Kvarnström, M. (2017). Examining Learners’ Interaction in an Open Online Course through the Community of Inquiry Framework. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 61-79.

Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016). The impact of teaching presence on online engagement behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 887-900.




CONTRIBUTE A RESPONDING EDITORIAL


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

D. Randy Garrison
Professor Emeritus, University of Calgary
D. Randy Garrison is professor emeritus at the University of Calgary.Dr. Garrison has published extensively on teaching and learning in adult, higher and distance education contexts. He has authored, co-authored or edited fifteen books; 94 articles; 68 book chapters; 40 conference proceedings; and more than 100 academic presentations. His major books are: Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (3rd Edition); Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking Collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry; Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines; Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). A transactional perspective on teaching-learning: A framework for adult and higher education. Curriculum vitae


EDITORIAL KEYWORDS



RECENT EDITORIALS

Motivation and the CoI Framework
D. Randy Garrison
October 6, 2022
Recently a graduate student interviewed me about the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework and the issue of motivation. This caused me to reflect on work that I had done on the topic of motivation earlier in my career that had indirectly contributed to ...

Shared Metacognition and Regulation Response
D. Randy Garrison
August 8, 2022
It is with some ambivalence that I draw your attention to an article that highlights arguable opportunities for improvement of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Shea, Richardson, & Swan, 2022). The focus of this article is on social ...

Collaborative Inquiry and Asynchronous Discourse
D. Randy Garrison
July 4, 2022
The purpose of this post is to explore the connection between collaborative inquiry (cognitive presence) and asynchronous discourse. As noted in a previous post ( Editorial 34 ), collaborative inquiry is increasingly being

Faculty Development and the Community of Inquiry
D. Randy Garrison
May 6, 2022
The focus of this short post is to highlight the essential role of faculty development and the role of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework in supporting faculty moving to online and blended learning. It has become apparent during the COVID ...

Automatic Detection of Social Presence
D. Randy Garrison
March 4, 2022
Several years ago, I provided an introduction to the role of learning analytics in the context of the Community of Inquiry framework and how we might facilitate collaborative learning through the automatic monitoring of discourse and tracking the ...
The Community of Inquiry is a project of Athabasca University, Mount Royal University, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and the Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, as well as researchers and members of the CoI community.